i cannot open windows explorer

test

passed

"joe" wrote in message
...
test

Failed.

--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
should things get worse after this,
PCR

"joe" wrote in message
...
| test

joe wrote in message ...
test

England 441 & 282-3 beat New Zealand 386 & 336 by seven wickets.

And Tampa Bay stomped Calgary, but even if I were wont to lord it over the
Western Canadians in my house (i.e., the entire remainder of the family), I
shan't. I dislike anything Floridian more than just about anything I can
think of, g.

Unfortunately, poor Smarty Jones pooped out well short of the finish line at
Belmont, and the Triple Crown trophy will continue to languish another year.

(What does one say to a cricket team or teams by way of congratulations,
anyway? And is that two teams against two? 'Splain, please?)

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP for Win9x

"Hugh Candlin" wrote in message
...

joe wrote in message
...
test

England 441 & 282-3 beat New Zealand 386 & 336 by seven wickets.

Gary S. Terhune wrote in message ...
And Tampa Bay stomped Calgary,

Stomped? Hardly. There is debate that Calgary "wuz robbed" of an equalizer.

but even if I were wont to lord it over the
Western Canadians in my house (i.e., the entire remainder of the family), I
shan't.

Jolly good show, old chap. Well played.

I dislike anything Floridian more than just about anything I can
think of, g.

Never been there. Hilton Head Island was the closest I ever got.

Unfortunately, poor Smarty Jones pooped out well short of the finish line at
Belmont, and the Triple Crown trophy will continue to languish another year.

Jockey error.

(What does one say to a cricket team or teams by way of congratulations,
anyway?

Jolly good show, chaps. Well played. Or some such rubbish.
[Under your breath, however, well, I'll leave that to your imagination].

And is that two teams against two? 'Splain, please?)

One team against one team. Two matches, back to back.
Total score wins. As in baseball, if the other team is "all out",
and your team is ahead on total scrore, the match is over, and you win.

So, New Zealand scored 386 all-out in their first set of innings
and 336 all-out in their second and final set, all-out,
for a total score of 722.

England then scored 441 in their first set of innings,
leaving them needing to score 282 in their second set of innings,
which they did with only 3 batsmen out, leaving them with
seven "wickets", or batsmen, still available to score runs.

While there are 10-a-side, you need one batsman at each end,
so you only really have 9 outs to play with (score runs with).

Thus, New Zealand got beat by seven wickets. Simple.

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP for Win9x

"Hugh Candlin" wrote in message
...

joe wrote in message
...
test

England 441 & 282-3 beat New Zealand 386 & 336 by seven wickets.

Thank you for your explanation, sir. And of course, you are probably correct
in all of your analyses, except that whether or not Calgary wuz robbed in
game six, they were definitely *stomped* in game seven, regardless of that
fantastic goal shot in the 3rd period.

Not so sure, either, that it was jockey error. That horse definitely has a
mind of his own and just wouldn't settle down in the back stretch. Wanted to
lead from the moment he left the gate. Perhaps the jockey could have done
more to rein him in, but we'll never know.

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP for Win9x

"Hugh Candlin" wrote in message
...

Gary S. Terhune wrote in message
...
And Tampa Bay stomped Calgary,

Stomped? Hardly. There is debate that Calgary "wuz robbed" of an
equalizer.

but even if I were wont to lord it over the
Western Canadians in my house (i.e., the entire remainder of the
family), I
shan't.

Jolly good show, old chap. Well played.

I dislike anything Floridian more than just about anything I can
think of, g.

Never been there. Hilton Head Island was the closest I ever got.

Unfortunately, poor Smarty Jones pooped out well short of the finish
line at
Belmont, and the Triple Crown trophy will continue to languish another
year.

Jockey error.

(What does one say to a cricket team or teams by way of congratulations,
anyway?

Jolly good show, chaps. Well played. Or some such rubbish.
[Under your breath, however, well, I'll leave that to your imagination].

And is that two teams against two? 'Splain, please?)

One team against one team. Two matches, back to back.
Total score wins. As in baseball, if the other team is "all out",
and your team is ahead on total scrore, the match is over, and you win.

So, New Zealand scored 386 all-out in their first set of innings
and 336 all-out in their second and final set, all-out,
for a total score of 722.

England then scored 441 in their first set of innings,
leaving them needing to score 282 in their second set of innings,
which they did with only 3 batsmen out, leaving them with
seven "wickets", or batsmen, still available to score runs.

While there are 10-a-side, you need one batsman at each end,
so you only really have 9 outs to play with (score runs with).

Thus, New Zealand got beat by seven wickets. Simple.

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP for Win9x

"Hugh Candlin" wrote in message
...

joe wrote in message
...
test

England 441 & 282-3 beat New Zealand 386 & 336 by seven wickets.

What's a wicket?
-----Original Message-----

Gary S. Terhune wrote in message
...
And Tampa Bay stomped Calgary,

Stomped? Hardly. There is debate that Calgary "wuz
robbed" of an equalizer.

but even if I were wont to lord it over the
Western Canadians in my house (i.e., the entire
remainder of the family), I
shan't.

Jolly good show, old chap. Well played.

I dislike anything Floridian more than just about
anything I can
think of, g.

Never been there. Hilton Head Island was the closest I
ever got.

Unfortunately, poor Smarty Jones pooped out well short
of the finish line at
Belmont, and the Triple Crown trophy will continue to
languish another year.

Jockey error.

(What does one say to a cricket team or teams by way of
congratulations,
anyway?

Jolly good show, chaps. Well played. Or some such
rubbish.
[Under your breath, however, well, I'll leave that to
your imagination].

And is that two teams against two? 'Splain, please?)

One team against one team. Two matches, back to back.
Total score wins. As in baseball, if the other team
is "all out",
and your team is ahead on total scrore, the match is
over, and you win.

So, New Zealand scored 386 all-out in their first set of
innings
and 336 all-out in their second and final set, all-out,
for a total score of 722.

England then scored 441 in their first set of innings,
leaving them needing to score 282 in their second set of
innings,
which they did with only 3 batsmen out, leaving them with
seven "wickets", or batsmen, still available to score
runs.

While there are 10-a-side, you need one batsman at each
end,
so you only really have 9 outs to play with (score runs
with).

Thus, New Zealand got beat by seven wickets. Simple.

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP for Win9x

"Hugh Candlin" wrote in message
...

joe wrote in
message
...
test

England 441 & 282-3 beat New Zealand 386 & 336 by
seven wickets.





.

ppoatt wrote in message ...
What's a wicket?

A set of 3 wooden stumps. Each set is 9 in/22.86cm wide,
and consists of three wooden stumps with two wooden bails on top.

Two sets of wickets are pitched opposite and parallel to each other
at a distance of 22 yards/20.12m between the centres of the 2 middle stumps.

British?
I can't see how American English has it's roots in
British English.
If the sport does not include an oblong object made out
of pigskin? I'm at a lose.
Besides...I'm still looking for the "any" key.
-----Original Message-----

ppoatt wrote in
message ...
What's a wicket?

A set of 3 wooden stumps. Each set is 9 in/22.86cm wide,
and consists of three wooden stumps with two wooden bails
on top.

Two sets of wickets are pitched opposite and parallel to
each other
at a distance of 22 yards/20.12m between the centres of
the 2 middle stumps.


.