A Windows 98 & ME forum. Win98banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Win98banter forum » Windows ME » Networking
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Win ME & 2000 Networking



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 16th 04, 04:11 AM
Jerry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Win ME & 2000 Networking

I have a 3 computer wireless network using Netgear
adapters. The computer with Windows ME can not browse the
other 2 pcs(running XP Home & Win 2000) on the network.
The 2000 pc can browse the other 2 pcs and the XP can
browse the other 2 pcs. Drives & folders are set for
sharing on the other 2 pcs. I can get internet access on
all 3 pcs. I can ping from the ME computer to the other 2
pcs. I have all 3 pcs set up in the workgroup
named "WORKGROUP". All pcs have file & printer sharing
enabled. Netgear suggested installing NetBEUI which I
installed on the ME and 2000 pcs, but this did not solve
the problem. I also went thru the Windows ME home
networking wizard but this did not solve the problem. Any
suggestions?
  #2  
Old August 16th 04, 05:15 AM
Steve Winograd [MVP]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Jerry"
wrote:
I have a 3 computer wireless network using Netgear
adapters. The computer with Windows ME can not browse the
other 2 pcs(running XP Home & Win 2000) on the network.
The 2000 pc can browse the other 2 pcs and the XP can
browse the other 2 pcs. Drives & folders are set for
sharing on the other 2 pcs. I can get internet access on
all 3 pcs. I can ping from the ME computer to the other 2
pcs. I have all 3 pcs set up in the workgroup
named "WORKGROUP". All pcs have file & printer sharing
enabled. Netgear suggested installing NetBEUI which I
installed on the ME and 2000 pcs, but this did not solve
the problem. I also went thru the Windows ME home
networking wizard but this did not solve the problem. Any
suggestions?


I disagree with Netgear, Jerry. In my experience, adding a protocol
to a malfunctioning Windows network can make the problem worse,
especially when XP is involved. Even if the network works after
adding another protocol, it won't work optimally, because the
additional protocol is a bandage covering up a basic problem that
still exists. It's better to fix the basic problem and have an
optimal network setup.

Remove NetBEUI from all computers, and make sure that TCP/IP is the
only protocol.

Is the problem that ME can't see the other computers at all? If so,
make sure that:

1. A firewall program isn't blocking access, and:
2. NetBIOS over TCP/IP is enabled on all computers.
3. Browse Master is disabled on ME.

Is the problem that ME sees the other computers but can't access the
shared disks and folders that it sees because "access is denied"? If
so, create matching user accounts on all computers, with the same user
name and password.
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)

Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.

Microsoft Most Valuable Professional - Windows Networking
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com

Steve Winograd's Networking FAQ
http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/faq.htm
  #3  
Old August 16th 04, 05:30 PM
Lou
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:15:29 -0600, "Steve Winograd [MVP]"
wrote:

In article , "Jerry"
wrote:
I have a 3 computer wireless network using Netgear
adapters. The computer with Windows ME can not browse the
other 2 pcs(running XP Home & Win 2000) on the network.
The 2000 pc can browse the other 2 pcs and the XP can
browse the other 2 pcs. Drives & folders are set for
sharing on the other 2 pcs. I can get internet access on
all 3 pcs. I can ping from the ME computer to the other 2
pcs. I have all 3 pcs set up in the workgroup
named "WORKGROUP". All pcs have file & printer sharing
enabled. Netgear suggested installing NetBEUI which I
installed on the ME and 2000 pcs, but this did not solve
the problem. I also went thru the Windows ME home
networking wizard but this did not solve the problem. Any
suggestions?


I disagree with Netgear, Jerry. In my experience, adding a protocol
to a malfunctioning Windows network can make the problem worse,
especially when XP is involved. Even if the network works after
adding another protocol, it won't work optimally, because the
additional protocol is a bandage covering up a basic problem that
still exists. It's better to fix the basic problem and have an
optimal network setup.

Remove NetBEUI from all computers, and make sure that TCP/IP is the
only protocol.

Is the problem that ME can't see the other computers at all? If so,
make sure that:

1. A firewall program isn't blocking access, and:
2. NetBIOS over TCP/IP is enabled on all computers.
3. Browse Master is disabled on ME.

Is the problem that ME sees the other computers but can't access the
shared disks and folders that it sees because "access is denied"? If
so, create matching user accounts on all computers, with the same user
name and password.


Steve,

How do you disable Browse Master on ME?

Thank you,

Lou
  #4  
Old August 17th 04, 07:02 AM
Steve Winograd [MVP]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Lou
wrote:
Steve,

How do you disable Browse Master on ME?

Thank you,

Lou


1. Go to Control Panel | Network.
2. Double click "File and Printer Sharing" in the list of components.
3. Specify "Disabled" as the value for Browse Master.
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)

Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.

Microsoft Most Valuable Professional - Windows Networking
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com

Steve Winograd's Networking FAQ
http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/faq.htm
  #5  
Old August 21st 04, 01:48 AM
Jerry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


-----Original Message-----
In article ,

Lou
wrote:
Steve,

How do you disable Browse Master on ME?

Thank you,

Lou


1. Go to Control Panel | Network.
2. Double click "File and Printer Sharing" in the list of

components.
3. Specify "Disabled" as the value for Browse Master.
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)

Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news

group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer

questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.

Microsoft Most Valuable Professional - Windows Networking
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com

Steve Winograd's Networking FAQ
http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/faq.htm
.
I got the Windows ME computer to see the other computers

in the network by removing the IPX protocol which was
installed along with the TCP/IP protocol. Thanks.
  #6  
Old August 22nd 04, 09:10 AM
Steve Winograd [MVP]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Jerry"
wrote:
I got the Windows ME computer to see the other computers
in the network by removing the IPX protocol which was
installed along with the TCP/IP protocol. Thanks.


You're welcome, Jerry. You might have seen messages in this news
group that recommend adding the IPX protocol as a necessary step in
solving all networking problems. That advice appears here so often
that some people who haven't tried it might think that it must be
true. You've confirmed what I've been saying for years:

1. Windows networks work best with the same single protocol on all
computers.

2. Adding another protocol, even on just one computer, can make the
network unreliable.
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)

Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.

Microsoft Most Valuable Professional - Windows Networking
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com

Steve Winograd's Networking FAQ
http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/faq.htm
  #7  
Old August 23rd 04, 09:37 AM
Carey Holzman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The only advice I have seen about IPX is for DIAGNOSING networking problems.
I don't see any post that says it's required or recommended as a permanent
solution or requirement for networking.

So, if you're referring to my tips, you've obviously misunderstood them. If
IPX solves the networking problem, some people just leave it alone because
it works and they are frustrated and don't want to diagnose any further.
That's entirely their choice.

It's up to the end user to make that decision and not a requirement or
pre-requisite of a 'properly configured' or 'working network.'

Hope that clears up any mis-understanding.

Carey


"Steve Winograd [MVP]" wrote in message
...
In article , "Jerry"
wrote:
I got the Windows ME computer to see the other computers
in the network by removing the IPX protocol which was
installed along with the TCP/IP protocol. Thanks.


You're welcome, Jerry. You might have seen messages in this news
group that recommend adding the IPX protocol as a necessary step in
solving all networking problems. That advice appears here so often
that some people who haven't tried it might think that it must be
true. You've confirmed what I've been saying for years:

1. Windows networks work best with the same single protocol on all
computers.

2. Adding another protocol, even on just one computer, can make the
network unreliable.
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)

Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.

Microsoft Most Valuable Professional - Windows Networking
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com

Steve Winograd's Networking FAQ
http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/faq.htm



  #8  
Old August 23rd 04, 11:32 AM
Steve Winograd [MVP]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Carey Holzman"
wrote:
I got the Windows ME computer to see the other computers
in the network by removing the IPX protocol which was
installed along with the TCP/IP protocol. Thanks.


You're welcome, Jerry. You might have seen messages in this news
group that recommend adding the IPX protocol as a necessary step in
solving all networking problems. That advice appears here so often
that some people who haven't tried it might think that it must be
true. You've confirmed what I've been saying for years:

1. Windows networks work best with the same single protocol on all
computers.

2. Adding another protocol, even on just one computer, can make the
network unreliable.


The only advice I have seen about IPX is for DIAGNOSING networking problems.
I don't see any post that says it's required or recommended as a permanent
solution or requirement for networking.

So, if you're referring to my tips, you've obviously misunderstood them. If
IPX solves the networking problem, some people just leave it alone because
it works and they are frustrated and don't want to diagnose any further.
That's entirely their choice.

It's up to the end user to make that decision and not a requirement or
pre-requisite of a 'properly configured' or 'working network.'

Hope that clears up any mis-understanding.

Carey


Your web site doesn't mention any form of the word "diagnose". It
claims to "fix every peer-to-peer networking problem that anyone has
ever reported over two years with Windows".

Your first tip says to install IPX, and you insist that people follow
your steps: "If you want your network to work properly, you must
follow each step exactly." Your web site doesn't say to remove IPX
after diagnosing or fixing a problem.

I've diagnosed and fixed problems on dozens of networks in person, and
I've diagnosed and fixed problems on thousands of networks in the news
groups, without ever installing IPX, recommending that someone else
install IPX, or following the other steps on your web site.
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)

Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.

Microsoft Most Valuable Professional - Windows Networking
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com

Steve Winograd's Networking FAQ
http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/faq.htm
  #9  
Old August 24th 04, 08:43 AM
Carey Holzman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I may have to make that clarification, as it was once there on my web-site,
but it has been through several revisions and through such, may have been
lost in the shuffle.

It's all well and good that your diagnosis technique does not require IPX.
I'm sure you'll agree there is more than one way to diagnose any computer
problem. I can only speak for what has personally worked for me. I have
resolved each and every network problem I've ever encountered using my
techniques. That is my experience. I cannot speak or promote your experience
over mine, except to say that what works for you may not work or be
acceptable to others, and my tips are no different in that respect.

What concerns me is that you seem to suggest I am some how profiting and/or
endangering the stability or reliability when you make libelous claims. What
do you suppose my motivation is? What goal do you think I am trying to
accomplish?

I assure you, we're both here for the same purpose. We should be backing up
and supporting each other, even though our ways are different. That's what
enriches this forum - diversity.

I had a company redesign and maintain my site. I will double check to see if
the "This is not a how-to INSTALL, but rather a how-to DIAGNOSE" statement
was somehow left out of the revised page.

Had you (or anyone else) brought that to my attention, I would have had it
corrected sooner.

Thanks for your understanding and cooperation.

Carey

"Steve Winograd [MVP]" wrote in message
...
In article , "Carey Holzman"
wrote:
I got the Windows ME computer to see the other computers
in the network by removing the IPX protocol which was
installed along with the TCP/IP protocol. Thanks.

You're welcome, Jerry. You might have seen messages in this news
group that recommend adding the IPX protocol as a necessary step in
solving all networking problems. That advice appears here so often
that some people who haven't tried it might think that it must be
true. You've confirmed what I've been saying for years:

1. Windows networks work best with the same single protocol on all
computers.

2. Adding another protocol, even on just one computer, can make the
network unreliable.


The only advice I have seen about IPX is for DIAGNOSING networking
problems.
I don't see any post that says it's required or recommended as a permanent
solution or requirement for networking.

So, if you're referring to my tips, you've obviously misunderstood them.
If
IPX solves the networking problem, some people just leave it alone because
it works and they are frustrated and don't want to diagnose any further.
That's entirely their choice.

It's up to the end user to make that decision and not a requirement or
pre-requisite of a 'properly configured' or 'working network.'

Hope that clears up any mis-understanding.

Carey


Your web site doesn't mention any form of the word "diagnose". It
claims to "fix every peer-to-peer networking problem that anyone has
ever reported over two years with Windows".

Your first tip says to install IPX, and you insist that people follow
your steps: "If you want your network to work properly, you must
follow each step exactly." Your web site doesn't say to remove IPX
after diagnosing or fixing a problem.

I've diagnosed and fixed problems on dozens of networks in person, and
I've diagnosed and fixed problems on thousands of networks in the news
groups, without ever installing IPX, recommending that someone else
install IPX, or following the other steps on your web site.
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)

Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.

Microsoft Most Valuable Professional - Windows Networking
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com

Steve Winograd's Networking FAQ
http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/faq.htm



  #10  
Old August 24th 04, 09:00 AM
Carey Holzman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steve,

As a symbol of my sincerity in truly wanting to help others with regards to
the information contained on my web-site, I make you this offer:

If there is any additional installation/diagnostic information you would
like to see to make my page 'acceptable' in your eyes, submit it to me in
e-mail and I make certain that it gets added, word-for-word, to the site
with full credit to you. There is no space limitation and you will be free
to add anything you feel would be an alternative or more complete solution
to what is already offered there.

If you are unwilling to do that, then I ask you with all due respect to
please cease any future disparaging comments about my site or tips.

Carey




"Steve Winograd [MVP]" wrote in message
...
In article , "Carey Holzman"
wrote:
I got the Windows ME computer to see the other computers
in the network by removing the IPX protocol which was
installed along with the TCP/IP protocol. Thanks.

You're welcome, Jerry. You might have seen messages in this news
group that recommend adding the IPX protocol as a necessary step in
solving all networking problems. That advice appears here so often
that some people who haven't tried it might think that it must be
true. You've confirmed what I've been saying for years:

1. Windows networks work best with the same single protocol on all
computers.

2. Adding another protocol, even on just one computer, can make the
network unreliable.


The only advice I have seen about IPX is for DIAGNOSING networking
problems.
I don't see any post that says it's required or recommended as a permanent
solution or requirement for networking.

So, if you're referring to my tips, you've obviously misunderstood them.
If
IPX solves the networking problem, some people just leave it alone because
it works and they are frustrated and don't want to diagnose any further.
That's entirely their choice.

It's up to the end user to make that decision and not a requirement or
pre-requisite of a 'properly configured' or 'working network.'

Hope that clears up any mis-understanding.

Carey


Your web site doesn't mention any form of the word "diagnose". It
claims to "fix every peer-to-peer networking problem that anyone has
ever reported over two years with Windows".

Your first tip says to install IPX, and you insist that people follow
your steps: "If you want your network to work properly, you must
follow each step exactly." Your web site doesn't say to remove IPX
after diagnosing or fixing a problem.

I've diagnosed and fixed problems on dozens of networks in person, and
I've diagnosed and fixed problems on thousands of networks in the news
groups, without ever installing IPX, recommending that someone else
install IPX, or following the other steps on your web site.
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)

Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.

Microsoft Most Valuable Professional - Windows Networking
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com

Steve Winograd's Networking FAQ
http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/faq.htm



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
wanting to upgrade to 2000 Lisa General 2 August 12th 04 08:05 PM
FAQ: Win98 users: Upgrading to WinXP, IE6, etc. JM Setup & Installation 6 July 26th 04 01:44 PM
FAQ: Win98 users: Upgrading to WinXP, IE6, etc. JM Improving Performance 6 July 26th 04 01:44 PM
Downgrade Windows 2000 Server to Windows ME Derek Erb Setup & Installation 4 July 19th 04 04:21 PM
Dual Boot with windows 2000 jc General 6 June 18th 04 02:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 Win98banter.
The comments are property of their posters.