PDA

View Full Version : FAT32 Question


Dave
October 4th 08, 06:08 PM
Are there any downsides to converting to FAT32?


Thanks,

Don Phillipson[_5_]
October 4th 08, 08:35 PM
"Dave" > wrote in message
...

> Are there any downsides to converting to FAT32?

FAT32 is reputed less stable than NTFS (which
Win98 cannot read.)

--
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)

Jeff Richards
October 4th 08, 09:20 PM
http://www.project9.com/fat32/ under compatibility. There is no simple way
to convert back from FAT32 to FAT.
--
Jeff Richards
MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User)
"Dave" > wrote in message
...
>
> Are there any downsides to converting to FAT32?
>
>
> Thanks,

Bill in Co.
October 4th 08, 09:34 PM
Why would anybody want to convert from FAT32 to FAT16?

Jeff Richards wrote:
> http://www.project9.com/fat32/ under compatibility. There is no simple way
> to convert back from FAT32 to FAT.
> --
> Jeff Richards
> MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User)
> "Dave" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> Are there any downsides to converting to FAT32?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,

Jeff Richards
October 4th 08, 09:45 PM
If it turns out that there are any compatibility issues such as the ones
listed under compatibility at the site I mentioned.
--
Jeff Richards
MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User)
"Bill in Co." > wrote in message
...
> Why would anybody want to convert from FAT32 to FAT16?
>
> Jeff Richards wrote:
>> http://www.project9.com/fat32/ under compatibility. There is no simple
>> way
>> to convert back from FAT32 to FAT.

philo
October 5th 08, 03:40 AM
"Dave" > wrote in message
...
>
> Are there any downsides to converting to FAT32?
>
>
> Thanks,


If you have win98 installed on a fat16 partition
and your harddrive is 2 gigs or less, I'd just leave it....
but converting to fat32 should be fine.

However if your drive is larger than 2 gigs and you want to make larger
partitions,
then yes, I'd advise using fat32

or course you'd have to start over from scratch or use a 3rd party utility
such as partition magic.

Either way, back up your data first!

Dan
October 5th 08, 06:48 AM
I thought FAT32 just had less native security than NTFS and not less stability.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS

"Don Phillipson" wrote:

> "Dave" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> > Are there any downsides to converting to FAT32?
>
> FAT32 is reputed less stable than NTFS (which
> Win98 cannot read.)
>
> --
> Don Phillipson
> Carlsbad Springs
> (Ottawa, Canada)
>
>
>